Evaluation of the accuracy of the Masimo Pronto compared to laboratory spectrophotometric method of intraoperative haemoglobin measurement

dc.contributor.authorOguntuase, O. O
dc.contributor.authorAdekola, O. O
dc.contributor.authorDada, O. I. O
dc.contributor.authorOlatosi, J. O
dc.contributor.authorOgunleye, E. O
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-01T10:18:21Z
dc.date.available2022-08-01T10:18:21Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionScholarly articleen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Transfusion decisions intra-operatively are generally guided by accurate blood loss estimation and intermittent invasive haemoglobin measurement. We investigated the accuracy of non- invasive intraoperative haemoglobin measurement using the Masimo Pronto (SpHb) as compared to laboratory spectrophotometry (tHb). Methods and Materials This was a cross sectional study of 110 adult patients undergoing surgery with a potential for blood loss of 500 ml and over under general anaesthesia. Haemoglobin level was determined simultaneously post-induction, pre-transfusion and postoperatively using (SpHb) readings from Masimo Pronto® Pulse CO-Oximeter (Rainbow® SET® Technology Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA) and haemoglobin analyzer with laboratory spectrophotometry (tHb). Results A total of 244 sample pairs were analysed; 110 post-induction, 24 pre-transfusion and 110 post-operatively. There was a significant difference in mean haemoglobin between SpHb and tHb during the study at all time periods, p<0.0001. The overall mean haemoglobin was SpHb 12.02 ±1.86 g/dl, and tHb10.49 ±1.92 g/dl, p<0.0001, bias (1.5 ±1.76 g/dl), and limits of agreement-1.9 to 5.0 g/dl. There was moderate Pearson correlation (0.57) between SpHb and tHb measurements. The mean pre-transfusion haemoglobin was SpHb 10.25 ±1.96 g/dl, and tHb 8.26 ±1.27 g/dl, p<0.0001, bias, 2.0 ±1.89 g/dl and limits of agreement, -1.7 to 5.7 g/dl. Conclusion It is concluded that SpHb overestimated haemoglobin measurement as compared with tHb. Hence the Masimo Pronto was found to be inaccurate as compared with laboratory spectrophotometry in intraoperative haemoglobin measurement. The bias was too large and limits of agreement too wide between SpHb and tHb to make appropriate transfusion decisions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOguntuase O. O, Adekola O.O, Dada O. I. O, Olatosi J. O, Ogunleye E. O. Evaluation of the accuracy of the masimo pronto compared to laboratory spectrophotometric method of intraoperative haemoglobin measurement. Highland Med Res J 2019;19(1&2):6-11en_US
dc.identifier.issn1596-2407
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.unilag.edu.ng/handle/123456789/10982
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAfrican Journals Onlineen_US
dc.subjectHaemoglobinen_US
dc.subjectInvasiveen_US
dc.subjectNon--invasiveen_US
dc.subjectTransfusionen_US
dc.subjectIntraoperativeen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Surgery::Anaesthetics and intensive careen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the accuracy of the Masimo Pronto compared to laboratory spectrophotometric method of intraoperative haemoglobin measurementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Massimo HMRJ 2019.pdf
Size:
466.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: