Re: critical review on dry socket.

dc.contributor.authorAdeyemo, W.L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T18:53:28Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T18:53:28Z
dc.date.issued2004-02-01
dc.description.abstractI refer to the article ‘Contemporary view on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management: a critical review by Dr I. R. Blum’. I have personally observed through reading of published articles on the subject that there are a lot of inconsistency not only in diagnostic criteria but also in the study designs. So, I was expecting a systematic review (considered the highest level in the evidence hierachy), NOT a critical review. But, separating the ‘Wheat’ from the ‘chaff ’ was not possible according to Dr I. R. Blum, hence a quantitative systematic review (metaanalysis) was not possible.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAdeyemo WL. Re: critical review on dry socket. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Feb;32(1):111; author reply 112.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.unilag.edu.ng/handle/123456789/6547
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectDry socketen_US
dc.subjectCritical reviewen_US
dc.titleRe: critical review on dry socket.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Adeyemo4.pdf
Size:
40.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Letter to the Editor
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: