Transcultural perception of maxillary midline diastema
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015
Authors
Akinboboye, B.O
Ajayi, Y.O
Umesi, D.C
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry
Abstract
Purpose: Perception of maxillary midline diastema as an esthetic trait varies in relation to culture, age group, and racial background. Although midline diastema is accepted in Africa, there are few reports on interethnic perrception of midline diastema among Nigerians.
Methods: Participants aged 19 to 45 years were selected from six geographical zone in Nigeria; one state was randomly selected from each zone, and a local government area (LGA) selected from each state. A structured questionnaire including a set of color smile photographs with varying sizes of maxillary midline diastema (narrowest = 2 mm;
widest = 6 mm) was administered. Information sought was age, gender, socio economic group, tribe, presence of midline diastema and grading of smile attractiveness.
Results: A total of 402 subjects aged 19 to 45 years and a mean age of 36.3 years
(± 0.714) took part in this study. The highest proportion of subjects with midline diastema was aged 21 to 30 years (33.9%), females (29.8%), from the Hausa ethnic group (35%), and from the class II socioeconomic group (31.9%). Among the ethnic groups, Hausa had the highest (65%) preference for midline diastema. Females (58.8%) and those in the class II
socioeconomic group (68.1%) also had the highest preference for midline diastema. There was a strong relationship between incidence of and preference for midline diastema (P = 0.000). All ethnic groups rated maxillary midline diastema as attractive, especially when the width was within 2 to 3 mm (P = 0.02).
Conclusion: All ethnic groups perceived maxillary midline diastema to be an esthetic attribute, provided the width was within 2 to 3 mm.
Description
Scholarly article
Keywords
Citation
Akinboboye BO, Ajayi Y.O, Umesi DC. Transcultural perception of maxillary midline diastema. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2015; 10: 611 -617.