Comparison of four methods of hand washing in situations of inadequate water supply

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorOgunsola, F.T.
dc.contributor.authorAdesiji, Y.O.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-06T12:20:42Z
dc.date.available2020-01-06T12:20:42Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.descriptionStaff publicationsen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Hand washing is the single most important means of preventing hospital acquired inrections, but requires for effectiveness, a constant supply of running water and proper facilities. Most developing countries do not have constant running water facilities, so alternate methods have been developed and used in clinics and hospitals. OBJECTIVE: To compare and validate alternate methods of hand washing developed for use in Nigeria. METHODS: The hands of 12 volunteers were pre-contaminated with known isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aerugiuosa. The volunteers washed their hands as described hy Ayliffe. The hands and equipment were cultured pre- and post-contamination and post-hand washing, The water used for the hand wash was also cultured pre-hand washing to control for water-based contamluation. Each method was evaluated three thncs and various parts of the equipment were cultured to determine the areas contaminated by the hands during the hand wash. RESULTS: ''Elbow-way" was shown to be the best and the gold standard Sink and Tap for promoting an effective hand washing, as there was no evidence of post-contamination. The worst was the single-bowl method in which the hands of all the 12(100%) volunteers were contaminated from the bowl, followed by the two-bowl initiative 10(83%) and the bucket and bowl 9(75 % ). CONCLUSION: The bucket and bowl as well as the single- howl methods most commonly used in hospitals result in gross contamination of the bowls and bucket and are therefore unsafe and should be discouraged. The elbow way on the other hand appears to be an easy and safe alternative in situations where there is no running water. WAJM 2008; 27(1): 24-28.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOgunsola, F.T. and Adesiji, Y.O. (2008). Comparison of Four Methods of Hand Washing in Situations of Inadequate Water Supply. West African Journal of Medicine; 27 (1): 24 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.google.com/search?q=Comparison+of+Four+Methods+of+Hand+Washing+in+Situations+of+Inadequate+Water+Supply&oq=Comparison+of+Four+Methods+of+Hand+Washing+in+Situations+of+Inadequate+Water+Supply&aqs=chrome..69i57.741j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.unilag.edu.ng/handle/123456789/7256
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWest African Journal of Medicine;Vol.27(1)
dc.subjectHospital acquired infectionen_US
dc.subjectHand washingen_US
dc.subjectRunning wateren_US
dc.subjectDeveloping countriesen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::MEDICINE::Microbiology, immunology, infectious diseasesen_US
dc.titleComparison of four methods of hand washing in situations of inadequate water supplyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of Four Methods of Hand Washing in situations of inadequate water supply.pdf
Size:
3.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Medical Microbiology and parasitology- Scholarly Publications